Tag Archives: postmodern

gerhard richter’s abstraktes bild, 2004

IMG_3273 by formenteragirl
IMG_3273, a photo by formenteragirl on Flickr.

one of my favorites from the armory this year, along with the francesca woodmans


black clock at kgb, 3/21

this sunday, head to the east village (after soaking up some sun at prospect park or the highline or outdoors somewhere for brunch) in order to hear some of the early contributors to the literary journal black clock, started by one of my favorite writers, steve erickson.  erickson and ventura have been two of my favorites for many years, to some extent because both so deftly weave together the esoteric and the vernacular, writing compulsively, revisiting terrain, self-referential, full of echoes and allusions and references to the american pop culture and political backdrop.  our continuum in all our manic ambivalence, conceit and fury. sunday’s roster:  samuel r. delany, rick moody, lynne tillman, joanna scott and shelley jackson.

read more on erickson at litpark or bookslut

4-6 pm, + ample time for drinking


85 e. 4th, free

new don delillo: point omega

i couldn’t take on falling man (“9/11 fiction”, though by all rights delillo is the writer for the job), but i think this one i’ll pick up.  out tuesday, feb. 2 and he’ll be at bookcourt feb. 11 with it.  below review from max read, timeout, chosen mostly for its spareness and my lack of shared opinion with that espoused on esquire’s, nymag’s and others i found.  waiting for the times and the new yorker to weigh in, but with libra, mao II, white noise and underworld all on my shelves, it’s not much of a deliberation.  i’m ready for a new delillo book:  funny, scary-smart, scientific/futuristic, postmodern, philosophical, political.  if a reviewer is given opportunity to work teleological in, good stuff to come.

“What do you mean, you’ve never heard of the “omega point”? Aren’t you familiar with the works of early-20th-century Jesuit philosopher Pierre Teilhard de Chardin? Oh, well: Don DeLillo will explain it to you anyway in his slim, excellent, Teilhard-touting new novel, Point Omega, where the obscure Jesuit comes up in a series of informal interviews between 73-year-old former professor and war strategist (probably for the second Iraq War, though it isn’t specified) Richard Elster and New York movie director Jim Finley. The latter wants to film the aging academic talking about his experiences as a top-secret military planner, creating a kind of Fog of War for Generation Y.

If you’ve read anything else by DeLillo, you probably know the deal: The two men spin fascinating bullshit in the charged language of people talking about one thing (the intellectual side of Elster’s career) while thinking about something else (geopolitical chaos). The prose is spare to the point of ponderousness; the ideas dense to the edge of incomprehensibility. Ultimately, no film is made, an unspeakable tragedy strikes, and the interlocutors face the blunt truths of loss and absence.

But what does this have to do with our Jesuit friend Pierre? The omega point is the teleological coordinate of maximum universal complexity and self-consciousness, a point that Teilhard equated with Christ and that Elster, holding court on his porch, equates with, one slowly gathers, death, apocalypse and the ruin of humanity. The two scenes bookending Elster and Finley’s conversations are set at a MoMA screening of Douglas Gordon’s 24 Hour Psycho, an installation that slows Hitchcock’s classic to a 24-hour run time that Elster describes as “like watching the universe die over a period of about 7 billion years.” Reading Point Omega is a similar experience. DeLillo slows down the rapid approach of the world’s end and meticulously ponders its signs, all the while exploring the space between each relentless, uncomfortable moment.”—Max Read

DeLillo reads at BookCourt Feb 11.

Michael Haneke’s “White Ribbon”

Michael Haneke’s “White Ribbon”

Posted using ShareThis

austrian writer and director michael haneke’s new film, the white ribbon, likely to be the best film of 2009 unseen by most people.  haneke is easily one of the smartest and most incisive filmmakers working today and his 2005 film cache is a worthy indicator of the reason:   his films resonate long after viewing because he presents well-developed stories and characters bound by political themes, often told in a postmodern structure which has no tidy ending or explanation.  cache followed one family’s unravelling as the husband’s childhood crime followed him over decades, haunting, implicating and terrorizing his family for the distance he tried to put between himself, his guilt and the wronged party, finally escalating in a violent act the further fallout of which is never revealed, only hinted at by the film’s close.  a.o. scott describes “the white ribbon” as a “study of child abuse, class resentment and incipient fascism,” and haneke has already been awarded the palme d’or at cannes, an international critics prize and a cinema film award;  it is being hailed as his masterpiece.

“nothing stays white here very long.”–steve erickson

from the postmodern novel, arc d’x, by steve erickson.  one of the books i have to (re-) read annually & apparently now’s the time.  parts of this book find their way into everything i turn out, which always reminds me of his line:  “i am haunted by associations that aren’t even my own.”  i read this the first time back when it came out in 1993 when i was 17 & still know some of it by heart from writing scraps of it on everything from notebooks & jeans to my walls.  parts of it informed my thesis proposal in:re what redemption means in non-christian terms and how the individual’s failure of the idea is the birthplace of malice.  it is a surreal book which takes the relationship between thomas jefferson and one of his slavegirls and uses it to illustrate the impossibility of reconciling passion and conscience, and reincarnates this relationship in several other parallels spanning place and time, to wrestle with notions of love, freedom,  religion, accountability, revolution, betrayal, violence, chaos, power. it got under my skin and the only way to make peace with it is to revisit and relay.  excerpt below:  

“what finally loses a man’s soul,” thomas says,”the betrayal of his conscience or the betrayal of his heart?” he looks up at georgie as if the boy with tattooed wings will actually have an answer to this question; the old man’s beatific smile struggles to surface against the pain in his head.  he raises an old finger, “both, you’re thinking.  aren’t you?  you’re thinking both.”  he nods.  “but what if you have to choose?  what if your life is forced to one or the other and there’s no avoiding having to choose?  what if your life chooses for you, or she does,” and georgie is startled, because thomas is indicating the woman in the bed.  the old man tries to unbend himself from his chair but doesn’t have the energy; he collapses from the effort.  he glares around him at the affront of the room’s light.  he mutters, “virginia runs with blood, like my dreams of paris,” and he smells of smoke.
“you’re a disgrace,” georgie charges.  but his voice cracks.  trying again he manages, “you’re drunken scum and it isn’t right you call yourself that name.”  america is the name he means.
thomas knows it’s the name georgie means.  “of course,” he nods, “the flesh,” and he pulls at the old weathered skin on his face, “is too pale to be american flesh. isn’t it?” and he keeps pulling at his face for the momentary hot rush of blood to his fingertips.  he massages his wrists and georgie sees how raw they’re rubbed, as though they’ve only recently been released from chains.  thomas looks at the bed and says, “and what if she had answered yes?  when i asked her to go back to america with me, what if she had promised different? what if, there in the square of the bastille among the glass and blood and gunpowder, she had said yes i’ll return with you to america as the slave of your pleasure, instead of turning as she did and disappearing from my life forever into paris’ roiling core, while i stood at the top of the street screaming her name?  what if my life had chosen my heart rather than my conscience?  what if i’d put a price on her head and shackled her naked in the cabin of my ship like the property she was?  what if i’d smuggled her back to virginia pleasing my heart every day for the rest of my life and left my conscience to god or the hypocrites who claim to serve him?  let them try to stop me from taking her back, paris and its revolution.  let it shrivel and petrify like a small black fossil, my tyrannic conscience.  happiness is a dark thing to pursue,”  the old man hisses at georgie, his eyes glimmering brighter and madder at the bald boy, “and the pursuit itself is a dark thing as well.  even god knows that.  above everything else, god especially knows that.”  thomas seizes his racked head.  when the pain subsides just enough he whispers, “what if i’d loved her my whole life.”  his old eyes are wet.  “would the conscience be as shriveled and petrified as the heart is now?  where’s the frontier of the first irrevocable corruption?  where’s the first moment in the negotiation of the heart and conscience when one so betrays the other that the soul’s rotting begins? god’s hypocrites will say there’s no difference between one corruption and another, that the smallest is as damnable as the biggest:  but i made a country once.  it was the country of redemption, somewhere this side of god’s.  it was the frontier of the first irrevocable compromise between the heart’s freedom and the conscience’s justice, past which the soul can still redeem itself.”  he clutches his head again and moans, “the blood.”